Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic FP3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and FP3 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-565UZ was launched 11 months before the FP3 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the FP3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Panasonic FP3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic FP3
| SP-565UZ | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| FP3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FP3
| SP-565UZ | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP3 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic FP3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the SP-565UZ and the FP3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and FP3 is 72 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The picture underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and FP3.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic FP3 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $400 | $182 |