Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") come with different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-565UZ was launched 3 months earlier than the FS42 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ matches up vs the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic FS42
SP-565UZ | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
FS42 | SP-565UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FS42
SP-565UZ | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | April 2009 | Same generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.5" | 2.5" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the FS42.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and FS42 is 72 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and FS42.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The SP-565UZ uses the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field easier.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $400 | $580 |