Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic FX90, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the FX90 (12MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was brought out 3 years prior to the FX90 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the FX90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic FX90
| SP-565UZ | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| FX90 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FX90
| SP-565UZ | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ features outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FX90 has sizing of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic FX90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the FX90.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and FX90 is 72 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and FX90.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Panasonic FX90 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-08-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $400 | $227 |
