Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") use different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-565UZ was introduced 8 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the FZ2500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic FZ2500
SP-565UZ | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
FZ2500 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FZ2500
SP-565UZ | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") and a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the FZ2500.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and FZ2500 is 72 and 53 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and FZ2500.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-565UZ using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give you more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 915 grams (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $998 |