Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c79/58c794040207e91e605fedcaea71fc3f3c2b02a9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front"
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Announced April 2019
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Succeeded the Panasonic G85
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic G95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was unveiled 11 years before the G95 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SP-565UZ scores against the G95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic G95
SP-565UZ | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
G95 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2019 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 124 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic G95
SP-565UZ | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic G95 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the G95.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbdc0/bbdc09af3148c8ab7d0e09a393480932008fe9d8" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and G95 is 72 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/037ea/037ea78c269c8f0ba4b972c73a502ca4d5eb43a0" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and G95.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Panasonic G95 will give you extra detail having an extra 10.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0570/c057045dd963d95c4e1e79eb12e68ea9c204644d" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6456f/6456f47ec2b0a7b36c563c74df426391d05cbf75" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20.3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 536 grams (1.18 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $998 |