Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d922/3d92276b7d9e74705fc702679568ccbb33cc2193" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front"
90 Imaging
48 Features
48 Overall
48
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Announced August 2011
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF2
- Later Model is Panasonic GF5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic GF3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the GF3 (12MP) is very well matched but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and GF3 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was unveiled 3 years prior to the GF3 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the SP-565UZ matches up vs the GF3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic GF3
SP-565UZ | GF3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
GF3 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic GF3
SP-565UZ | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Panasonic GF3 has proportions of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic GF3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ against the GF3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29f82/29f82e786b811461ba4569464f7cb2cbeb3708c3" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and GF3 is 72 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29157/29157030d0fc27d5ec6a397f0155d7d60d21b64e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and GF3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Panasonic GF3 will resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce903/ce90351b42fa8b690c9aa0d623587f8da19e6fd3" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f4be/7f4bee0ff5bf1f407234deeb1df20946e64ad0d2" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2011-08-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 264g (0.58 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 20.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | 459 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $360 |