Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c5/412c547ac6ea230796d84fdf7002bf3eb9374bca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 112g - 98 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic S2, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and S2 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was announced 4 years before the S2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the S2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic S2
SP-565UZ | S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
S2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic S2
SP-565UZ | S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic S2 has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 112 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic S2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dfd7/1dfd7e3615724bd585faace55b850f1cfa039933" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and S2 is 72 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d71b/8d71bf89744ff8a6b7c1f3f5489485a69d12e9b1" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and S2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Panasonic S2 to offer you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3ed4/c3ed49418c27f8386159caf1aea62eaac2a4f587" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbae7/dbae7c719b51b47171f639e4fd2e889987b3cc34" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic S2 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 112 gr (0.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 98 x 57 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $400 | $109 |