Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and ZR3 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-565UZ was brought out 12 months before the ZR3 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the ZR3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic ZR3
| SP-565UZ | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| ZR3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic ZR3
| SP-565UZ | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the ZR3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and ZR3 is 72 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and ZR3.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic ZR3 to result in more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2010-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $280 |
