Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
64 Imaging
64 Features
82 Overall
71
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Pentax K-S1
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and K-S2 (20MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and K-S2 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe SP-565UZ was revealed 7 years before the K-S2 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the K-S2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax K-S2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Pentax K-S2
SP-565UZ | K-S2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
K-S2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 73 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax K-S2
SP-565UZ | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ has physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Pentax K-S2 has measurements of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the K-S2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and K-S2 is 72 and 64 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and K-S2.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-S2 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax K-S2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 5.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 678 gr (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $581 |