Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax MX-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was launched 5 years prior to the MX-1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the MX-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ & Pentax MX-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Pentax MX-1
| SP-565UZ | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| MX-1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax MX-1
| SP-565UZ | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ features outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ against the MX-1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and MX-1 is 72 and 84 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and MX-1.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax MX-1 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 391 grams (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $400 | $400 |