Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax MX-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-565UZ was launched 5 years prior to the MX-1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the MX-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ & Pentax MX-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Pentax MX-1
| SP-565UZ | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| MX-1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax MX-1
| SP-565UZ | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ features outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ against the MX-1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and MX-1 is 72 and 84 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and MX-1.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax MX-1 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 391 grams (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $400 | $400 |