Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SP-565UZ was announced 5 years earlier than the WG-3 GPS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the WG-3 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SP-565UZ | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WG-3 GPS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 54 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| SP-565UZ | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the WG-3 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WG-3 GPS is 72 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The image here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to resolve extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $400 | $350 |