Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and G900 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SP-565UZ was manufactured 10 years prior to the G900 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the G900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh G900
| SP-565UZ | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| G900 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 110 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh G900
| SP-565UZ | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ features outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the SP-565UZ against the G900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and G900 is 72 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and G900.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh G900 to offer more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $752 |