Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively similar but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-565UZ was unveiled 3 years before the GR Digital IV which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SP-565UZ grades against the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SP-565UZ GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 GR Digital IV SP-565UZ 
LaunchedSeptember 2011January 2009Newer by 32 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SP-565UZ GR Digital IV 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the GR Digital IV.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and GR Digital IV is 72 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ offers the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
39
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
40
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
56
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
33
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery power (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
52
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
better than average battery power (390 CIPA)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
40
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
52
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (390 CIPA)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
24
fairly wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus SP-565UZRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-15 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 gr (0.91 pounds) 190 gr (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID 4 x AA DB65
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $400 $599