Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
72
Imaging
32
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
67
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Successor is Ricoh GR III
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-565UZ was manufactured 10 years prior to the GR III which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the GR III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh GR III

 SP-565UZ GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 GR III SP-565UZ 
RevealedSeptember 2018January 2009More modern by 118 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh GR III

 SP-565UZ GR III 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

See the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the GR III.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and GR III is 72 and 90 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and GR III.

As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-565UZ featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will deliver more detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Portrait photography camera
39
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
80
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Ricoh GR III
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
83
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
supports touch focus
lighter than competitors (257 grams)
good high ISO (102,400)
fixed screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR III Sports photography advice
32
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
75
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR III Travel photography factors
52
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
great reach (520mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competitors (257g)
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Landscape photography camera
40
focusing manually
quite wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
69
manual focus
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
does not have anti-alias filter
good high ISO (102,400)
saves RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR III Vlogging advice
24
quite wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
37
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (257g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus SP-565UZRicoh GR III
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SP-565UZ Ricoh GR III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-15 2018-09-25
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 6400 102400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/2.8-16
Macro focus distance 1cm 6cm
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.40 m (ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 413 gr (0.91 lb) 257 gr (0.57 lb)
Physical dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light score 68 not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $400 $900