Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
90 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was manufactured 10 years prior to the GR III which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the GR III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh GR III
| SP-565UZ | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| GR III | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2018 | January 2009 | More modern by 118 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh GR III
| SP-565UZ | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the GR III.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and GR III is 72 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and GR III.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-565UZ featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will deliver more detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh GR III |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 257 gr (0.57 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $900 |