Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-6, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was launched 10 years before the WG-6 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the WG-6 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-6
| SP-565UZ | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WG-6 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 110 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-6
| SP-565UZ | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ features external dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ and the WG-6.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WG-6 is 72 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and WG-6.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-6 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 246 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $400 | $271 |
