Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was manufactured 14 years prior to the WG-80 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SP-565UZ matches up vs the WG-80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-80
| SP-565UZ | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WG-80 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 | January 2009 | More recent by 162 months | |
| Screen size | 2.70" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-80
| SP-565UZ | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides outer measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the WG-80.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WG-80 is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and WG-80.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to render more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $300 |