Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-565UZ was launched 6 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-565UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WG-M1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-565UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WG-M1 is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $2,000 |