Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-565UZ was launched 6 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-565UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WG-M1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
| SP-565UZ | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WG-M1 is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $2,000 |