Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and DV300F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-565UZ was introduced 4 years earlier than the DV300F and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the DV300F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung DV300F
| SP-565UZ | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| DV300F | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung DV300F
| SP-565UZ | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the DV300F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and DV300F is 72 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and DV300F.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung DV300F to offer you extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $400 | $200 |