Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was brought out 15 months earlier than the HZ50W making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the HZ50W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung HZ50W
SP-565UZ | HZ50W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus SP-565UZ
HZ50W | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung HZ50W
SP-565UZ | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7afba/7afbacb08aeb8105948406843ce005d6521fac9a" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and HZ50W is 72 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c488/7c488320a0935d2e27ef3b21abe583725f74c6f8" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and HZ50W.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung HZ50W to provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27d95/27d95c1114a1bd240a6a54919db305a451607cc0" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4af5c/4af5c28560f5960d92099025fa500f8a92a1dd73" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung HZ50W |
Alternative name | - | WB5500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $250 |