Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Samsung WB1100F front
Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung WB1100F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
  • Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SP-565UZ was revealed 6 years earlier than the WB1100F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-565UZ scores against the WB1100F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB1100F

 SP-565UZ WB1100F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 WB1100F SP-565UZ 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 60 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB1100F

 SP-565UZ WB1100F 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") along with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung WB1100F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WB1100F.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WB1100F is 72 and 67 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and WB1100F.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB1100F to deliver extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB1100F Portrait photography factors
39
focusing manually
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography info
Samsung WB1100F Street photography info
56
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
44
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (512g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Samsung WB1100F
33
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
amazing zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB1100F as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (875mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (512 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB1100F as a Landscape photography camera
40
focusing manually
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
45
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-565UZ
Vlogging with Samsung WB1100F
24
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
23
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (512 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB1100F
 Olympus SP-565UZSamsung WB1100F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Samsung WB1100F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-15 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 grams (0.91 pounds) 512 grams (1.13 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $400 $250