Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was brought out 3 years earlier than the WB210 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-565UZ scores against the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB210
| SP-565UZ | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WB210 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB210
| SP-565UZ | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WB210 is 72 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and WB210.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB210 to produce extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $279 |