Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SP-565UZ was announced 6 years before the WB350F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ matches up vs the WB350F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB350F

 SP-565UZ WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 WB350F SP-565UZ 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2009Fresher by 60 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB350F

 SP-565UZ WB350F 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-565UZ and the WB350F.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WB350F is 72 and 90 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and WB350F.

Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB350F to produce greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
39
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
40
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Samsung WB350F
56
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (276g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
33
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average in class (276g)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography info
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography info
40
has manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse recording
50
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging information
Samsung WB350F Vlogging information
24
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone support
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus SP-565UZSamsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Samsung WB350F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-15 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413g (0.91 lb) 276g (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $400 $260