Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SP-565UZ was manufactured 6 years before the WB35F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB35F

 SP-565UZ WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 WB35F SP-565UZ 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009Newer by 60 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB35F

 SP-565UZ WB35F 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WB35F.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and WB35F is 72 and 93 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and WB35F.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to offer you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography factors
39
focusing manually
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography information
Samsung WB35F Sports photography information
33
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
52
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
very long zoom (520mm)
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average (194 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
40
focusing manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse mode
43
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB35F Vlogging highlights
24
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic port
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB35F
 Olympus SP-565UZSamsung WB35F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-01-15 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 gr (0.91 lb) 194 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $400 $130