Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Released January 2014
Photography Glossary

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SP-565UZ was released 6 years prior to the WB50F and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the WB50F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB50F

 SP-565UZ WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 WB50F SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2009More recent by 60 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB50F

 SP-565UZ WB50F 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the WB50F.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and WB50F is 72 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and WB50F.

As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB50F to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
39
focusing manually
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Samsung WB50F
56
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
33
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Travel photography highlights
52
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than others (207g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography advice
40
focusing manually
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5")
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse function
47
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-565UZ
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
24
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
30
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus SP-565UZSamsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus SP-565UZ Samsung WB50F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-01-15 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 143 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.40 m (ISO 200) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 413 grams (0.91 pounds) 207 grams (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light score 68 not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD Picture Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $400 $180