Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
![Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-565UZ/Olympus-SP-565UZ-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A290.jpg)
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A230
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony A290, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and A290 (14MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The SP-565UZ was unveiled 17 months earlier than the A290 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SP-565UZ grades against the A290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony A290
SP-565UZ | A290 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
A290 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony A290
SP-565UZ | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the A290.
![Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-565UZ-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A290-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and A290 is 72 and 66 respectively.
![Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-565UZ-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A290-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and A290.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A290 will offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-SP-565UZ-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A290-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-565UZ-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A290-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $600 |