Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Renewed by Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was introduced 5 years before the NEX-3N and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the NEX-3N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony NEX-3N
SP-565UZ | NEX-3N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus SP-565UZ
NEX-3N | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony NEX-3N
SP-565UZ | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides external dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3dbe/a3dbedbb38b32ccd4f7b56ed94206db93eee3651" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and NEX-3N is 72 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33f24/33f24ce103688ae091d6b95ccfd36d29efd67c94" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and NEX-3N.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-565UZ with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3N will produce more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd16/6bd168a69572e2bea249e7910d2dd2ffd32a0ad2" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b51b3/b51b35963cbf3557c91da2f752c4836c5420cbf6" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $400 | $399 |