Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad078/ad078245ad2a75d1f90964f92a2525732af1b1b1" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front"
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony WX220, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WX220 (18MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was launched 6 years prior to the WX220 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the WX220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony WX220
SP-565UZ | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
WX220 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony WX220
SP-565UZ | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ has physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony WX220 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-565UZ and the WX220.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaba7/aaba7ad55acdcd9044847d14d422b694671100b1" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and WX220 is 72 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adf91/adf91b6457fc0d1e64867c0ce959ce2579f44e1a" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and WX220.
As you can see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony WX220 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f1c/70f1c4ae66bb93b49bdb11350d3bb98913164e15" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f8bb/3f8bbe0736ff809a9b3e452b20019ab100b5094f" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $400 | $198 |