Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Updated by Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-590 UZ was released 4 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-590 UZ grades versus the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
SP-590 UZ | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
TG-820 iHS | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-820 iHS
SP-590 UZ | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-590 UZ has physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-590 UZ vs the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-590 UZ and TG-820 iHS is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-590 UZ and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you should really consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SP-590 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $249 | $500 |