Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
- New Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-590 UZ was revealed 11 years before the TG-6 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SP-590 UZ grades vs the TG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Olympus Tough TG-6. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus TG-6
SP-590 UZ | TG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
TG-6 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2019 | January 2009 | Fresher by 126 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-6
SP-590 UZ | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-590 UZ has got outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-590 UZ against the TG-6.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-590 UZ and TG-6 is 72 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-590 UZ and TG-6.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you would want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older SP-590 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2019-05-22 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 253g (0.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $249 | $449 |