Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
- Later Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SP-590 UZ versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-590 UZ was unveiled 10 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SP-590 UZ grades vs the ZS200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Panasonic ZS200
SP-590 UZ | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
ZS200 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 110 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Panasonic ZS200
SP-590 UZ | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-590 UZ features outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-590 UZ versus Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-590 UZ and the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4ea0/f4ea0680cb51255974cf0f3391c22d86b4be9e04" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SP-590 UZ and ZS200 is 72 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/961d9/961d935028bc47ddf2d07f68a24869a97b937385" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The visual underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-590 UZ and ZS200.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SP-590 UZ with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will render extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-590 UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ebd/63ebd55a9f62644e2b38b7e230365973670028fc" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85734/85734d2a418f7eec84310c4314ace9057123468a" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 340 grams (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $249 | $800 |