Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2
72 Imaging
35 Features
38 Overall
36
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-590 UZ was manufactured 7 months earlier than the CX2 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SP-590 UZ matches up vs the CX2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Ricoh CX2
SP-590 UZ | CX2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
CX2 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | January 2009 | Newer by 7 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX2
SP-590 UZ | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-590 UZ has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-590 UZ compared to the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-590 UZ and CX2 is 72 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-590 UZ and CX2.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus SP-590 UZ to resolve extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged SP-590 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $249 | $341 |