Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-600 UZ was manufactured 3 years prior to the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-600 UZ grades vs the TG-630 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SP-600 UZ | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| TG-630 iHS | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SP-600 UZ | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the SP-600 UZ versus the TG-630 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-600 UZ and TG-630 iHS is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-600 UZ and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged SP-600 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $189 | $200 |
