Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-600 UZ was brought out 6 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SP-600 UZ grades vs the TG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus TG-4
| SP-600 UZ | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| TG-4 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 63 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Olympus TG-4
| SP-600 UZ | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-600 UZ provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SP-600 UZ versus the TG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-600 UZ and TG-4 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-600 UZ and TG-4.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to deliver greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455g (1.00 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $189 | $379 |