Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Panasonic ZS200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SP-600 UZ was released 9 years before the ZS200 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the SP-600 UZ scores against the ZS200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Panasonic ZS200
SP-600 UZ | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
ZS200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 97 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Panasonic ZS200
SP-600 UZ | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-600 UZ provides outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-600 UZ vs the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e6d/e8e6d1da1ba9c55439c1f3e4d2529f142d782c02" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-600 UZ and ZS200 is 69 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76b27/76b27284780f3dcd2bb602de719d11459a218049" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The image here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-600 UZ and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SP-600 UZ because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-600 UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa91e/aa91ee2a5292ec3ee7ed7137fd23577937a14e65" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeec9/eeec96b5fb31181f305573733511ae2915e72833" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $189 | $800 |