Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SP-600 UZ was released 12 months later than the CX1 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SP-600 UZ grades versus the CX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Ricoh CX1
| SP-600 UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| CX1 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh CX1
| SP-600 UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ features physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-600 UZ compared to the CX1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and CX1 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-600 UZ and CX1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-600 UZ to show greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger SP-600 UZ is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $189 | $299 |