Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- New Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-600 UZ was launched 17 months before the CX5 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SP-600 UZ matches up against the CX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Ricoh CX5
| SP-600 UZ | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| CX5 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh CX5
| SP-600 UZ | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SP-600 UZ and the CX5.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-600 UZ and CX5 is 69 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and CX5.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus SP-600 UZ to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $189 | $399 |