Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-600 UZ was launched 5 years earlier than the WG-4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SP-600 UZ scores vs the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Ricoh WG-4
| SP-600 UZ | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| WG-4 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-4
| SP-600 UZ | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-600 UZ features outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-600 UZ vs the WG-4.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-600 UZ and WG-4 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-600 UZ and WG-4.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged SP-600 UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $189 | $330 |