Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- New Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-600 UZ was manufactured 23 months earlier than the WB150F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SP-600 UZ matches up against the WB150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Samsung WB150F
| SP-600 UZ | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| WB150F | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Samsung WB150F
| SP-600 UZ | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-600 UZ and the WB150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-600 UZ and WB150F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and WB150F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB150F to give you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $189 | $230 |
