Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-600 UZ was released 3 years earlier than the WB250F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the SP-600 UZ grades versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-600 UZ & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Samsung WB250F
| SP-600 UZ | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| WB250F | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Samsung WB250F
| SP-600 UZ | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-600 UZ features physical dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-600 UZ compared to the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and WB250F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-600 UZ and WB250F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB250F to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged SP-600 UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $189 | $250 |