Clicky

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Newer Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SP-600 UZ was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the SP-600 UZ grades versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Samsung WB800F

 SP-600 UZ WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 WB800F SP-600 UZ 
LaunchedJanuary 2013February 2010Newer by 35 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Samsung WB800F

 SP-600 UZ WB800F 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ has got outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-600 UZ versus the WB800F.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and WB800F.

As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-600 UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
27
has manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
43
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
features face detect focusing
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
36
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
31
excellent zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
52
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ Travel photography factors
Samsung WB800F Travel photography factors
51
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (420mm)
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than others (218g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
29
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
49
focusing manually
quite wide (23mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
20
quite wide (28mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
35
quite wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (218 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus SP-600 UZSamsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-600 UZ Samsung WB800F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-02-02 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-420mm (15.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/2s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455g (1.00 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $189 $300