Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31


54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) use different sensor sizing.

The SP-600 UZ was revealed 16 months later than the A900 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SP-600 UZ matches up against the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Sony A900
SP-600 UZ | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | October 2008 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
A900 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony A900
SP-600 UZ | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ features physical dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony A900 has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Sony A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-600 UZ versus the A900.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and A900 is 69 and 54 respectively.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-600 UZ and A900.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-600 UZ with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A900 will offer greater detail because of its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer SP-600 UZ should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Cost at release | $189 | $2,736 |