Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
![Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-600-UZ/Olympus-SP-600-UZ-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S980/Sony-S980-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Released February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony S980, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the S980 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The SP-600 UZ was released 12 months later than the S980 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-600 UZ scores vs the S980 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-600 UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery & Sony S980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Sony S980
SP-600 UZ | S980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S980 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
S980 | SP-600 UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony S980
SP-600 UZ | S980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SP-600 UZ enjoys exterior dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony S980 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony S980 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-600 UZ and the S980.
![Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-600-UZ-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S980-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and S980 is 69 and 94 respectively.
![Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-600-UZ-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S980-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-600 UZ and S980.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you would want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The fresher SP-600 UZ provides an edge in sensor tech.
![Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-SP-600-UZ-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S980-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SP-600-UZ-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S980-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony S980 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $189 | $300 |