Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d06/91d06e64750ff9ea247ef7d29955562c9a21441b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front"
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony TX200V, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-600 UZ was announced 24 months before the TX200V making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SP-600 UZ grades vs the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Sony TX200V
SP-600 UZ | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
TX200V | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony TX200V
SP-600 UZ | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ features outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-600 UZ compared to the TX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c188/5c188ff3410672a48e0b304f0fb631987f8522f2" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-600 UZ and TX200V is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c329/0c32943937c4fe0c8bd546af987981a2d42fbd40" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-600 UZ and TX200V.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony TX200V to result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged SP-600 UZ will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e5ee/1e5eee7ab0cfecfa9af3c42fa2d665ff597e153f" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3da20/3da20ece4774e6c502b44a3b02d5f52c7a0f6148" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $189 | $500 |