Olympus SP-610UZ vs Panasonic FX78
79 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Old Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX77

Olympus SP-610UZ vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78: The Small-Sensor Compact Showdown for Your Next Camera
When choosing a compact camera, especially in the early 2010s era of point-and-shoot evolution, it’s crucial to understand how each model fits your photographic ambitions. Today, we’re putting two notable contenders side by side - the Olympus SP-610UZ and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. Both tout small 1/2.3" CCD sensors and fixed zoom lenses but diverge notably in feature sets, design, and intended use scenarios.
Having spent time thoroughly testing and comparing countless compact cameras over the past 15 years, I’ll guide you through their strengths, limitations, and ideal users. We’ll cover real-world image quality, autofocus behavior, ergonomics, video capabilities, and genre-specific performance.
Physical Size and Ergonomics: Olympus SP-610UZ vs Panasonic FX78
Unpacking Their Designs: Handling and Ergonomics Matter
The SP-610UZ is a hefty and chunky superzoom bridge-style compact, weighing in at 405g and measuring 107x73x73mm. In contrast, the FX78 is notably smaller and more pocketable, with a slim 100x55x21mm profile and just 142g weight. It’s a clear winner in the portability department.
- Grip and Handling: The SP-610UZ’s size lends a more secure hold, especially with its textured grips and substantial hand presence. This is invaluable for telephoto shots, where stabilization is key. The FX78’s slim, streamlined design favors casual snag-and-go shooting but may feel less stable at long zoom or in less-than-ideal lighting.
- Buttons and Layout: The Olympus features fewer buttons but a simpler interface aimed at casual users without manual exposure controls. Panasonic includes a touchscreen LCD - one of the early adopters around 2011 - offering intuitive menu navigation and tap-to-focus. However, the FX78 lacks dedicated physical controls for aperture or shutter priority modes, aligning it more with snapshot use.
Top View: Control Arrangement and Ergonomics
Both cameras omit an electronic viewfinder, which means you’ll rely solely on their LCDs. The FX78’s larger 3.5-inch screen is more comfortable for framing and reviewing images versus the Olympus’s 3-inch display, a practical advantage despite the same 230k dot resolution.
Sensor and Image Quality: Similar But Different CCD Implementations
While both cameras share a small 1/2.3” CCD sensor format, subtle differences impact image quality and low-light handling:
Sensor Comparison: Dimensions and Quality Factors
Feature | Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 6.08 x 4.56 mm |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Resolution | 14 MP | 12 MP |
Max ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Low Light Performance | Moderate, with noise at ISO 800+ | Slightly better, with usable ISO 1600+ |
In practical shooting tests, the FX78’s sensor combined with its Venus Engine FHD processor enables better high ISO control and finer noise reduction algorithms. The Olympus’s TruePic III processor is competent but struggles beyond ISO 800, resulting in noticeably grainier images.
Both cameras feature an anti-aliasing filter, which helps prevent moiré but slightly reduces fine detail resolution. The Olympus edges out in maximum resolution thanks to its 14MP sensor, providing slightly more detail for large prints or cropping.
Lens and Zoom: Superzoom vs. Standard Compact
Here the differences become stark - Olympus centers on zoom reach, while Panasonic prioritizes brightness and simplicity.
Feature | Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
---|---|---|
Zoom Range | 28–616 mm (22x optical zoom) | 24–120 mm (5x optical zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.3 (wide) – f/5.7 (tele) | f/2.5 (wide) – f/5.9 (tele) |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (mechanical shift) | Optical (lens-shift) |
The Olympus SP-610UZ provides an extraordinary 22x zoom, covering wide-angle to extreme telephoto, which is a fantastic tool for wildlife, sports, or travel photos where you can’t always get close. Its sensor-shift stabilization is crucial here to combat camera shake at long focal lengths.
The Panasonic’s wider aperture at the wide end (f/2.5) delivers better background separation and works better in low light, especially in street or indoor photography. However, its 5x zoom range limits telephoto potential.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Real Conditions
The Olympus employs contrast-detection autofocus with 11 focus points but no sophisticated tracking or face detection features. Conversely, the Panasonic shines with continuous AF, multi-area focusing, center priority, and limited tracking ability.
- Olympus SP-610UZ: Single AF mode only, focus can be slow, especially in low contrast or dim light. No face or eye detection.
- Panasonic FX78: Offers continuous autofocus for better tracking of moving subjects, which translates to a much-improved experience for capturing moments in sports or wildlife scenarios at closer ranges.
Continuous shooting rates differ significantly - Olympus maxes out at 1 fps, while Panasonic achieves 4 fps continuous, benefiting action photography.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Setting
Both cameras feature image stabilization, yet their methods differ:
- Olympus Sensor-Shift Stabilization: The SP-610UZ physically moves the sensor to counteract shake, which is excellent at longer focal lengths.
- Panasonic Optical Stabilization: The FX78 moves lens elements to stabilize, with beneficial effects in general handheld shooting.
In testing, sensor-shift often excels at extreme zoom ranges, matching Olympus’s superzoom capabilities well. Panasonic’s stabilization helps more with general walk-around photography and slower shutter speeds but is not designed for extreme telephoto.
Video Capabilities: High Definition, Frame Rates, and Codecs
Feature | Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) @ 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) @ 60 fps |
Video Codec | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD (higher efficiency) |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Headphone Port | No | No |
Stabilization | Yes (sensor-shift) | Yes (optical) |
If video is a core part of your creation process, the Panasonic FX78 delivers far sharper, smoother footage with its Full HD 1080p 60fps option. Olympus caps out at 720p and 30fps, which was standard for the time but is quite limited today.
Additionally, Panasonic’s support for AVCHD means smaller file sizes and better integration with video editing workflows.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Touchscreen vs Fixed LCD
Rear LCD Screens: Panasonic FX78’s Touchscreen Advantage vs Olympus SP-610UZ
The Panasonic FX78’s 3.5-inch touchscreen is a major ergonomic advantage. It lets you quickly select focus points, navigate menus, and playback images with intuitive gestures, speeding up your workflow.
Olympus’s 3.0-inch basic screen without touch support limits interaction speed, though it is bright and color-accurate.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots
Specification | Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | 4 x AA batteries | Proprietary rechargeable pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | ~340 shots | ~200 shots |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Internal Memory |
Olympus’s reliance on AA batteries is a double-edged sword. On one hand, AA cells are widely available and easy to swap out during travel or shooting sessions without a charger. On the other hand, their bulk contributes to the camera’s larger size, and alkaline batteries result in shorter battery life versus rechargeable Li-ion cells.
Panasonic’s built-in rechargeable battery results in a slimming of the camera, but remember to carry a charger or spare batteries for extended use. The FX78 also includes internal memory which can save a few photos if no card is present - a useful safety net.
Connectivity and Accessories: How Well Do They Play in Your Workflow?
- Olympus SP-610UZ:
- HDMI output for full HD TV playback
- USB 2.0 through proprietary port
- Wireless Eye-Fi card compatibility (requires separate purchase)
- Panasonic FX78:
- HDMI output; USB 2.0 connectivity
- No wireless networking options
Neither camera supports Bluetooth or NFC, consistent with the technology available in 2011. Eye-Fi compatibility on the Olympus offers a potential wireless transfer route but is dependent on an additional purchase and compatible SD card.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Photo Gallery: Samples illustrate the difference in image character, sharpness, and zoom versatility
- Portrait Photography: The Panasonic’s wider aperture at the wide end (f/2.5) and better low-light noise control make it preferable for natural skin tones indoors. However, without face detection or eye AF on either, you’ll need to compose carefully yourself.
- Landscape Photography: Olympus’s extra resolution and extreme zoom let you capture distant details, but lack of RAW format means less post-processing flexibility. Panasonic’s superior video and HDR modes can help with scenes featuring challenging dynamic range.
- Wildlife Photography: SP-610UZ’s 22x zoom is a clear winner, providing reach without the weight and cost of interchangeable lenses. However, its slow AF and single fps burst limit action capture. Panasonic’s faster AF helps capture animals in motion but limited zoom restricts reach.
- Sports Photography: Neither camera is ideal due to limited burst frame rates and AF systems, but Panasonic’s 4 fps is better for casual action shots.
- Street Photography: Panasonic’s compact size, quiet operation, and better low-light performance make it more discreet and enjoyable for candid street shooting.
- Macro Photography: Olympus can focus as close as 1cm, great for extreme close-ups; Panasonic’s minimum focus at 5 cm is more limited but still serviceable for casual macro.
- Night/Astro Photography: Panasonic’s higher max ISO and better noise handling help here; neither supports long exposures or bulb mode.
- Video Production: Panasonic far outshines Olympus with 1080p60 video and efficient AVCHD codec.
- Travel Photography: Olympus’s superzoom and AA battery convenience suit travel where power and reach are priorities. Panasonic wins on pocketability and quiet operation.
- Professional Work: Neither offers RAW support or advanced ergonomics expected by pros but Panasonic’s sharper images and better video provide more usable content in a pinch.
Durability and Build Quality: Weather Sealing and Robustness
Neither camera offers environmental sealing or ruggedization. The Olympus is chunkier and feels sturdier, suitable for being tossed in backpacks without too much worry, while the Panasonic’s compactness makes it less rugged but easier to carry.
Price and Value: Which Camera Fits Your Budget?
Camera | Current Average Price (USD) | Value Summary |
---|---|---|
Olympus SP-610UZ | ~$300 | Great zoom and versatility for price but dated in video and interface |
Panasonic FX78 | ~$210 | Compact, flexible, superior video, but limited zoom range |
Stock prices as of 2011-era release underline the Olympus’s premium for zoom range, while Panasonic offers stylish compactness and video appeal at a lower cost.
Overall Performance Ratings: Balanced Assessment Across Core MetricsPutting It All Together - Which Camera Should You Choose?
Genre-by-Genre Strengths and WeaknessesWho Should Buy the Olympus SP-610UZ?
- You want a superzoom with extensive reach for wildlife, sports, or travel photography without extra lenses.
- You prefer longer battery life and access to easy replacement AA batteries abroad.
- You can sacrifice top-tier video or touchscreen ease in favor of zoom capability.
- You’re okay with slower autofocus and no RAW files, shooting mostly JPEGs.
Who Should Buy the Panasonic Lumix FX78?
- You prioritize portability for street, travel, or everyday photography.
- You want better low-light performance and quicker autofocus.
- You desire Full HD 1080p video with smoother frame rates for vlogging or family videos.
- You appreciate touchscreen controls for easier focusing and review.
- You want a stylish, compact camera that slips easily in a pocket.
Final Thoughts
Both cameras represent well-crafted solutions for different photography needs in the early 2010s small sensor compact market. The Olympus SP-610UZ is a niche specialist delivering remarkable zoom flexibility - ideal for enthusiasts venturing into telephoto landscapes or wildlife. Meanwhile, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 champions usability and image quality in a super-compact form factor, suited to street and travel photographers embracing HD video.
If you have the chance, we highly recommend hands-on trials to experience handling differences and image output firsthand. Each model has distinct advantages that can enrich your creative journey when matched appropriately.
Explore compatible accessories like spare batteries for Olympus or SD cards with fast write speeds for Panasonic to maximize your shooting experience.
Equipped with these in-depth insights, you’re well-positioned to pick the camera that best fits your photographic aspirations and shooting style.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera inspire many memorable moments!
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-610UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-616mm (22.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.7 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 200 shots |
Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $299 | $210 |