Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg "Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front")
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the RX100 VA (20MP) is very comparable but the Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") have different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Galaxy Camera 4G was unveiled 6 years prior to the RX100 VA and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Galaxy Camera 4G scores vs the RX100 VA in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery & Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg "Sony RX100 VA front thumbnail")
/Sony-RX100-VA-screen-back.jpg "Sony RX100 VA screen back thumbnail")
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Sony RX100 VA
| Galaxy Camera 4G | RX100 VA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| RX100 VA | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2018 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 71 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1229k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+1229k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony RX100 VA
| Galaxy Camera 4G | RX100 VA |
|---|
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G comes with outer dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Sony RX100 VA has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 4G vs the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg "Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison")
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 4G and RX100 VA is 90 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg "Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison")
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The visual below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Galaxy Camera 4G and RX100 VA.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Galaxy Camera 4G with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 VA will provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Galaxy Camera 4G will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
-sensor-size-comparison.png "Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison")
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg "Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-08-29 | 2018-07-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | - | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 305g (0.67 lbs) | 299g (0.66 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $550 | $998 |