Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus 9000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-620 UZ was unveiled 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the SP-620 UZ matches up against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus 9000
| SP-620 UZ | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 33 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| 9000 | SP-620 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus 9000
| SP-620 UZ | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-620 UZ comes with exterior measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SP-620 UZ and the 9000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and 9000 is 78 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-620 UZ and 9000.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher SP-620 UZ should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Alternative name | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $199 | $300 |