Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020
Portability
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-620 UZ was released 24 months after the 6020 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SP-620 UZ grades vs the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus 6020
| SP-620 UZ | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| 6020 | SP-620 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus 6020
| SP-620 UZ | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has physical dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-620 UZ and the 6020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SP-620 UZ and 6020 is 78 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-620 UZ and 6020.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-620 UZ to render greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger SP-620 UZ should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography features
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography features
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
decent megapixels (13MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Street photography factors
Olympus 6020 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (122g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Sports photography factors
Olympus 6020 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
Travel photography with Olympus 6020
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (525mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than competition (122 grams)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (13MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 6020 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (122 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $199 | $279 |
