Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SP-620 UZ was released 13 months later than the TG-310 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SP-620 UZ grades vs the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus TG-310
SP-620 UZ | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
TG-310 | SP-620 UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-310
SP-620 UZ | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has external measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-620 UZ compared to the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/938f0/938f0864224be3062b3dbaa08b6952e99b439b78" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and TG-310 is 78 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67ae6/67ae63e4effb5a937afcd87ff778bebc9920d815" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-620 UZ and TG-310.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-620 UZ to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern SP-620 UZ is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b05e/6b05e15554bc484ff8a125642598ec692a42123c" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea9c/bea9ca2d371845324c4b993523a8ef6aeeab33a7" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $199 | $0 |