Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-620 UZ was revealed 6 months after the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SP-620 UZ scores vs the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus VR-320
| SP-620 UZ | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| VR-320 | SP-620 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus VR-320
| SP-620 UZ | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | July 2011 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-620 UZ versus the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and VR-320 is 78 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-620 UZ and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus SP-620 UZ to provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $199 | $179 |