Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SP-620 UZ was revealed 11 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the SP-620 UZ scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-620 UZ | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
XZ-2 iHS | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 11 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-620 UZ | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-620 UZ versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a674e/a674e6b33aa94725e845e1eed0908f951f312cbf" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and XZ-2 iHS is 78 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7835/c78356634d6d3a989e76ba80bb3556fbb4a702f6" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The photograph below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-620 UZ and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SP-620 UZ having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older SP-620 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6783d/6783d8d4feec043f0457b8c798f3e0bd4076a643" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc3de/dc3de32a4f7fdfae42fa51cba98676c885b73737" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $199 | $450 |